Adopted by a vote of 115-22, with 32 abstentions
...........................................................................
International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the legality of the threat
or use of nuclear weapons
(Submitted on October 29, 1996)
The General Assembly,
Recalling its resolution 49/75 K requesting the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons is permitted in any circumstance under international law;
Mindful of the solemn obligations of States, undertaken in Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, particularly to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament;
Recalling resolution 50/70 P of 12 December 1995, in which it called upon the Conference on Disarmament to establish an ad hoc committee on nuclear disarmament to commence negotiations on a phased programme of nuclear disarmament and for the eventual elimination of nuclear weapons within a time-bound framework;
Recalling also the Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament adopted at the 1995 Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and in particular the objective of determined pursuit by the nuclear-weapon States of systematic and progressive efforts to reduce nuclear weapons globally with the ultimate goal of eliminating those weapons;
Recognizing that the only defence against a nuclear catastrophe is the total elimination of nuclear weapons and the certainty that they will never be produced again;
Desiring to achieve the objective of a legally binding prohibition of the development, production, testing, deployment, stockpiling, threat or use of nuclear weapons and their destruction under effective international control;
Reaffirming the commitment of the international community to the goal of the total elimination of nuclear weapons and welcoming every effort towards this end;
Reaffirming the central role of the Conference on Disarmament as the single multilateral disarmament negotiating forum;
Noting the adoption of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty by the General Assembly in its resolution 50/245 on 10 September 1996;
Regretting the absence of multilaterally negotiated and legally binding security assurances against the threat or use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states;
Convinced that the continuing existence of nuclear weapons poses a threat to all humanity and that their use would have catastrophic consequences for all life on Earth;
1. Expresses its appreciation to the International Court of Justice for responding to the request made by the General Assembly at its forty-ninth session;
2. Takes note of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996;
3. Underlines the unanimous conclusion of the Court that there exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control;
4. Calls upon all States to fulfill that obligation immediately by commencing multilateral negotiations in 1997 leading to an early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention prohibiting the development, production, testing, deployment, stockpiling, transfer, threat or use of nuclear weapons and providing for their elimination;
5. Requests the Secretary-General to provide the necessary assistance to support the implementation of the present resolution;
6. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its fifty-second session an item entitled "Follow up to the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons".
Return to World Court menuThe United Nations Disarmament Committee today adopted the Malaysian resolution on follow-up to the World Court's advisory opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
The resolution welcomed the unanimous conclusion of the World Court that "there exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control," and called for the beginning in 1997 of multilateral negotiations leading towards a Nuclear Weapons Convention. Such a convention would prohibit the development, production, testing, deployment, stockpiling, transfer, threat or use of nuclear weapons and provide for their elimination.
The resolution was adopted by a vote of 94 in favour, 22 against and 29 abstaining. China, the only declared nuclear state which supported the resolution called for the immediate beginning of negotiations on an internationally binding treaty on non-use of nuclear weapons and on their prohibition.
The US, which opposed the resolution, stated that it took selective quotes from Article VI of the Non Proliferation Treaty and left out any reference to "general and complete disarmament". The US also stated its opposition to multi-lateral negotiations stating that nuclear disarmament is an intricate process requiring sensitive security calculations which cannot realistically be conducted in a multi-lateral forum.
Aotearoa-New Zealand voted in favour stating that "In our view the resolution reinforces the importance of fulfilling the obligation to pursue and conclude negotiations leading to complete nuclear disarmament."
Canada called for separate votes on operative paragraph 3 (which welcomes the unanimous conclusion of the Court that there exists an obligation to begin and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects), and operative paragraph 4 (which calls on negotiations in 1997 leading to a Nuclear Weapons Convention).(See text of resolution) The vote on operative paragraph 3 was 115 in favour, 7 against and 19 abstentions. The vote on operative paragraph 4 was 87 in favour, 27 against and 27 abstentions.
The resolution goes to the full plenary of the United Nations in December.